Poster © movieposters.com · 320×480, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.44 they all agreed 2 critics · 40 to 48
Wicked: For Good
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
- How they landed
- they all agreed2 critics, 40 to 48
- What they said
If you bought the first film's brash visual aesthetic – the result of a giant toddler vomiting candyfloss all over Walt Disney World – then you will be relieved to discover it has got no less stomach-unsettling.
Donald Clarke, The Irish Times · we gave it 48- Film
- Jon M. Chu · 2025 · United States
The guide3 of 7 came up
very mild · mild · moderate · strong · very strong — the board’s own five words, in its own order
Violence
Sex and nudity
Swearing
Drink and drugs
Upsetting
Offensive
Hard to sit through
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 14/11/2025. Their words: Mild threat, violence, innuendo, language.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
All 2 reviews
So cowed by its iconic predecessor.
Justin Chang, The New Yorker · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00012140we gave it
If you bought the first film's brash visual aesthetic – the result of a giant toddler vomiting candyfloss all over Walt Disney World – then you will be relieved to discover it has got no less stomach-unsettling.
Donald Clarke, The Irish Times · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00012248we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Carry thisdrop it into any page · nothing to sign, nothing to pay
<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/wicked-for-good/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 44 for Wicked: For Good"></iframe>