Poster, owner not recorded in our source, found at en.wikipedia.org · 320×480, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.68 they fought about it 3 critics · 35 to 86
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
James Gunn tried to make a great Superman movie, one that embraces the wonder of the character as an action hero and a moral paragon, which derives its drama from how people react to his faith in us.William Bibbiani, TheWrap · we gave it 86
Pointless, cluttered backstory.Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · we gave it 35
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 14/07/2025. Their words: Moderate violence, threat, injury detail, language.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
A movie that doesn't sacrifice its titular character in service to franchise-building. Instead, it focuses on celebrating the values that Superman himself has embodied from the beginning.
Liz Shannon Miller, Consequence · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000093James Gunn tried to make a great Superman movie, one that embraces the wonder of the character as an action hero and a moral paragon, which derives its drama from how people react to his faith in us. He succeeded.
William Bibbiani, TheWrap · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000094Pointless, cluttered backstory.
Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000095<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/superman/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 68 for Superman"></iframe>