Poster © X · 320×400, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.68 they split 3 critics · 55 to 76
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
Ground Zero does not rely on high-octane theatrics but packs in ample thrills, making it an engaging and impactful watch.Dhaval Roy, The Times of India · we gave it 76
Ground Zero is a respectful biopic but a story like this needed more heart to make an actual impact.Mayur Sanap, Rediff.com · we gave it 55
Certificate reasons from the British Board of Film Classification, classified 17/04/2025. Their words: Strong bloody violence, injury detail.
We could not read the certificate itself off their page, so we do not print one.
Ground Zero does not rely on high-octane theatrics but packs in ample thrills, making it an engaging and impactful watch.
Dhaval Roy, The Times of India · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000037Ground Zero is a respectful biopic but a story like this needed more heart to make an actual impact.
Mayur Sanap, Rediff.com · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000038Despite its few shortcomings, it is an incredibly relevant and timely film.
Hardika Gupta, NDTV · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP000039<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/ground-zero/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 68 for Ground Zero"></iframe>