Poster, owner not recorded in our source, found at en.wikipedia.org · 320×476, fair use, to show which film it is. Why.78 they all agreed 2 critics · 74 to 82
Appalachian Dog
Read by Marlow, First Reader · what that means · what he keeps
- How they landed
- they all agreed2 critics, 74 to 82
- What they said
A sultry, post-WWII, Southern Gothic delight.
Debbie Lynn Elias, Behind the Lens · we gave it 82- Film
- Colin Henning · 2025 · United States · 100 min
The guide0 of 7 came up
very mild · mild · moderate · strong · very strong — the board’s own five words, in its own order
Violence
Sex and nudity
Swearing
Drink and drugs
Upsetting
Offensive
Hard to sit through
No classification board we can read has certified this film. We checked the British and American boards; something that has played festivals and had a limited run often has no certificate anywhere yet. Everything above is what the critics we read happened to mention. That is not the same answer asked the same way every time, and we will not dress it up as one. When a board classifies it, this fills in.
All 2 reviews
Carves out a distinct corner of the world it inhabits.
Richard Gray, The Reel Bits · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00001174we gave it
A sultry, post-WWII, Southern Gothic delight.
Debbie Lynn Elias, Behind the Lens · quoted in Wikipedia, original not read by us · FP00001282we gave it
Who wrote about this filmgo read them
Carry thisdrop it into any page · nothing to sign, nothing to pay
<iframe src="https://fp.caelivonstudios.com/embed/appalachian-dog/"
width="380" height="86" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
title="FP 78 for Appalachian Dog"></iframe>